This Editorial Policy explains the standards Rajasv aims to follow when planning, researching, writing and updating articles.
1. Reader-first topic selection
We prioritise topics that help readers understand software categories, compare concepts, plan digital workflows or ask better questions during software evaluation. Headlines should describe the actual article rather than rely on clickbait.
2. Research and sources
Where evidence matters, we prefer primary and authoritative sources such as official documentation, standards, government publications and established technology providers. Vendor sources can be useful for defining a category or explaining a product capability, but vendor marketing claims should not automatically be treated as neutral evidence.
3. Clear distinction between concepts and recommendations
Explainers describe common software concepts and typical capabilities. If Rajasv publishes product comparisons or recommendations in the future, selection criteria, commercial relationships and material limitations should be disclosed clearly.
4. AI-assisted editorial work
AI tools may assist with research organisation, outlining, drafting, language editing, formatting or structured-data preparation. AI output can be incomplete or incorrect, so factual statements should be checked and the final article remains the responsibility of the publisher.
5. Corrections
Material factual errors should be corrected as soon as reasonably practical after they are identified. Minor spelling or formatting changes may be made without a separate notice. Readers can report a potential error through the Contact page.
6. Updates
Articles may be updated when definitions, software capabilities or implementation practices change. A visible modified date can appear when an article receives a substantive update.
7. Sponsored and affiliate content
If Rajasv publishes sponsored content or uses affiliate links, the commercial relationship should be disclosed in a clear way near the relevant content. Payment should not be presented as independent editorial validation.